Todd Peterson
05-15-2007, 02:26 PM
Now that I have returned from the Utah trip with the new King Katmai, I would like to pass along my thoughts, observations and some pictures of the new IO-550 powered King Katmai and its high altitude performance. I will break the flight test report into three or four different segments over the next couple of weeks. I will also post some pictures of a couple of back country strips I flew into while in Utah. The beauty surrounding these strips is beyond words. Unfortunately someone crashed their airplane at one of the strips I flew into during my stay in Utah. More on that later.
I would also like to say thank you to a new friend I met while staying at the Carbon County Airport in Price, UT. Larry Newby of Redtail Aviation www.redtailaviation.com, obviously has the same back country sense of adventure I do. He welcomed me to the area, was extremely helpful, and offered to show me some of his favorite (and secret) back country strips. I wanted to give him a ride in the new King Katmai as bad as he wanted one, but I had a head cold that continued to get worse, so we agreed to get together this fall. Thanks again to Larry for all his hospitality.
The trip over and back was uneventful which is always nice when you are flying behind an engine with only 11 hours TT. The things that stick in my mind the most about the flight over and back center around the power available at the higher altitudes and the fuel burn. With the stock TCM injector nozzles the engine could be run LOP at altitudes below 5,500 feet. At these lower altitudes the engine LOP is smooth with fuel consumption rates similiar to the IO-470 ROP. The problem I encountered was at the higher altitudes. The EGT spread was in the area of 100F which is way too high to give a smooth engine when LOP. This was verified with a large power reduction and some vibration when run LOP at the higher altitudes. Due to this, I ran ROP for most of the trip which produced fuel flows from 16.5 gph to an eye watering 19 gph depending on altitude and percent of power used. This gave me my first King Katmai lesson. All the King Katmais that leave our facility must be capable of running LOP at the higher altitudes when the customer picks up the airplane. My guess is most of the King Katmais will require GAMIjectors, and we will need to install those prior to delivery. It would have been much nicer seeing fuel flows in the area of 14.5 gph LOP vs. 19 gph ROP. In the long run I think the engine would also be happier with the lower fuel flows.
The King Katmais cruising speed with the 29 inch Bush Wheels ran from 130 knots to 143 knots TAS at various altitudes and power settings. At the lower altitudes I consistently saw 134 knots on 12.8 gph LOP. My impression is at altitude we should be getting 134 to 138 knots with the fuel flow around 13 to 14 gph LOP. If one wants to go ROP, the speeds will run around 144 kts. Based on this I would expect the new 300SE to have cruise speeds in the 160 plus knot range. The engine/prop combination is very smooth. I spent considerable time researching this as there have been vibration problems in the past with both the 520 and 550 engines. These vibration issues seem to center around certain props, so I was careful in selecting the one we used. I think it paid off. Take off, climb, and cruise produce a very, very smooth engine. This is the second thing I learned about the King Katmai. The engine/prop combination we selected has no adverse vibration issues which had been a real concern of mine.
The CHTs and the Oil Temp all ran in the normal range throughout the trip in spite of some pretty hot weather. With the cowl flaps closed I was recording oil temps in the 180F to 193F range most of the time. This was often with outside temperatures in the low 90's. This trip pretty much demonstrated there will be no cooling problems with this engine installation. Even during climb out on these warm days, the Oil Temp seldom ran above 190F. Likewise, the CHT's never gave me a second's worth of trouble with most of the CHT's in climb no warmer than 385F.
On the return trip I landed at Taos, NM for fuel. When taxiing out the ASOS said the density altitude was 9,100 feet. Nothing to sneeze at to be sure. After I departed I made a tight down wind departure, and by the time I reached mid field I was already at 2,000 ft AGL. The rate of climb was a staggering 1,500 fpm. I then turned directly east and just went straight over the top of the mountains. No muss, no fuss, just straight over the top. It was great. Mountains just don't have the significance they used to when you can maintain a high rate of climb at 12,000 feet.
When I arrived back at EQA the engine had 29.2 hrs TT, and I am now going to a regular AD oil. I removed the cowl for the oil change, and the engine is clean with no items needing attention. It should be more than ready for our Idaho trip in mid June.
In the next segment I will deal with the handling characteristics of the King Katmai on the demo flights I flew while in Utah. The final segments will be on the back country strips I took the airplane into, my thoughts as to the King Katmai's actual performance vs. projected performance, and some thoughts on what it takes to safely fly into and out of some of these hazardous strips. I will also announce the production schedule for the King Katmai and the 300SE.
Stay tuned...
I would also like to say thank you to a new friend I met while staying at the Carbon County Airport in Price, UT. Larry Newby of Redtail Aviation www.redtailaviation.com, obviously has the same back country sense of adventure I do. He welcomed me to the area, was extremely helpful, and offered to show me some of his favorite (and secret) back country strips. I wanted to give him a ride in the new King Katmai as bad as he wanted one, but I had a head cold that continued to get worse, so we agreed to get together this fall. Thanks again to Larry for all his hospitality.
The trip over and back was uneventful which is always nice when you are flying behind an engine with only 11 hours TT. The things that stick in my mind the most about the flight over and back center around the power available at the higher altitudes and the fuel burn. With the stock TCM injector nozzles the engine could be run LOP at altitudes below 5,500 feet. At these lower altitudes the engine LOP is smooth with fuel consumption rates similiar to the IO-470 ROP. The problem I encountered was at the higher altitudes. The EGT spread was in the area of 100F which is way too high to give a smooth engine when LOP. This was verified with a large power reduction and some vibration when run LOP at the higher altitudes. Due to this, I ran ROP for most of the trip which produced fuel flows from 16.5 gph to an eye watering 19 gph depending on altitude and percent of power used. This gave me my first King Katmai lesson. All the King Katmais that leave our facility must be capable of running LOP at the higher altitudes when the customer picks up the airplane. My guess is most of the King Katmais will require GAMIjectors, and we will need to install those prior to delivery. It would have been much nicer seeing fuel flows in the area of 14.5 gph LOP vs. 19 gph ROP. In the long run I think the engine would also be happier with the lower fuel flows.
The King Katmais cruising speed with the 29 inch Bush Wheels ran from 130 knots to 143 knots TAS at various altitudes and power settings. At the lower altitudes I consistently saw 134 knots on 12.8 gph LOP. My impression is at altitude we should be getting 134 to 138 knots with the fuel flow around 13 to 14 gph LOP. If one wants to go ROP, the speeds will run around 144 kts. Based on this I would expect the new 300SE to have cruise speeds in the 160 plus knot range. The engine/prop combination is very smooth. I spent considerable time researching this as there have been vibration problems in the past with both the 520 and 550 engines. These vibration issues seem to center around certain props, so I was careful in selecting the one we used. I think it paid off. Take off, climb, and cruise produce a very, very smooth engine. This is the second thing I learned about the King Katmai. The engine/prop combination we selected has no adverse vibration issues which had been a real concern of mine.
The CHTs and the Oil Temp all ran in the normal range throughout the trip in spite of some pretty hot weather. With the cowl flaps closed I was recording oil temps in the 180F to 193F range most of the time. This was often with outside temperatures in the low 90's. This trip pretty much demonstrated there will be no cooling problems with this engine installation. Even during climb out on these warm days, the Oil Temp seldom ran above 190F. Likewise, the CHT's never gave me a second's worth of trouble with most of the CHT's in climb no warmer than 385F.
On the return trip I landed at Taos, NM for fuel. When taxiing out the ASOS said the density altitude was 9,100 feet. Nothing to sneeze at to be sure. After I departed I made a tight down wind departure, and by the time I reached mid field I was already at 2,000 ft AGL. The rate of climb was a staggering 1,500 fpm. I then turned directly east and just went straight over the top of the mountains. No muss, no fuss, just straight over the top. It was great. Mountains just don't have the significance they used to when you can maintain a high rate of climb at 12,000 feet.
When I arrived back at EQA the engine had 29.2 hrs TT, and I am now going to a regular AD oil. I removed the cowl for the oil change, and the engine is clean with no items needing attention. It should be more than ready for our Idaho trip in mid June.
In the next segment I will deal with the handling characteristics of the King Katmai on the demo flights I flew while in Utah. The final segments will be on the back country strips I took the airplane into, my thoughts as to the King Katmai's actual performance vs. projected performance, and some thoughts on what it takes to safely fly into and out of some of these hazardous strips. I will also announce the production schedule for the King Katmai and the 300SE.
Stay tuned...